<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will FeedBurner or Plain XML Get You More Subscribers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/</link>
	<description>Better Looking Blogs Grow Faster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pradeep f</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-33989</link>
		<dc:creator>pradeep f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-33989</guid>
		<description>Even i was in search for the same answer.After reading i think that the feedburner feed according to me is more user friendly than raw xml format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even i was in search for the same answer.After reading i think that the feedburner feed according to me is more user friendly than raw xml format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-33306</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-33306</guid>
		<description>Some really interesting points there and something that I had no even considered before. I use feedburner as a standard and haven&#039;t even considered doing it any other way, but its true that if people are use to working a different way then this layout may be a little alien. I will definitely be looking more into this to consider the options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some really interesting points there and something that I had no even considered before. I use feedburner as a standard and haven&#8217;t even considered doing it any other way, but its true that if people are use to working a different way then this layout may be a little alien. I will definitely be looking more into this to consider the options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lutfie Tutorial Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-32967</link>
		<dc:creator>Lutfie Tutorial Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-32967</guid>
		<description>nice info ilike this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice info ilike this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CitizenSecure</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-24423</link>
		<dc:creator>CitizenSecure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-24423</guid>
		<description>These days, with advancements in Chrome as well as IE8 (soon 9), FF, and Safari, it really doesn&#039;t matter what kind of XML. And I agree with the last comment here, that plain text, (and leaned as much as possible), will always load fastest and, especially with RSS, that&#039;s the goal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, with advancements in Chrome as well as IE8 (soon 9), FF, and Safari, it really doesn&#8217;t matter what kind of XML. And I agree with the last comment here, that plain text, (and leaned as much as possible), will always load fastest and, especially with RSS, that&#8217;s the goal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhyra.com</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-23260</link>
		<dc:creator>dhyra.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-23260</guid>
		<description>as publisher, feedburner is preferred, cause you can organize and analyze your feed. They also tell you how many subscribers for your site.

as subscriber, plain text is preferred, this because plain text load faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as publisher, feedburner is preferred, cause you can organize and analyze your feed. They also tell you how many subscribers for your site.</p>
<p>as subscriber, plain text is preferred, this because plain text load faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inchirieri Masini</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-22747</link>
		<dc:creator>Inchirieri Masini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-22747</guid>
		<description>I personally prefer plain RSS. But feedburner continues to gain support as a de facto tool for blogs more people will probably use the feedburner page to display their feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally prefer plain RSS. But feedburner continues to gain support as a de facto tool for blogs more people will probably use the feedburner page to display their feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artesanos</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20986</link>
		<dc:creator>Artesanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20986</guid>
		<description>I heard that FeedBurner can be a bit all over the place in regards to your stats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that FeedBurner can be a bit all over the place in regards to your stats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juegos Didacticos</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20290</link>
		<dc:creator>Juegos Didacticos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20290</guid>
		<description>I usually do go through the spam filter, so even the simple fact you have a Gravatar will help any future comments of yours stand out for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually do go through the spam filter, so even the simple fact you have a Gravatar will help any future comments of yours stand out for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curso esmalte</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20175</link>
		<dc:creator>Curso esmalte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20175</guid>
		<description>The other thing that I liked was that it had been produced specifically as a CMS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other thing that I liked was that it had been produced specifically as a CMS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martín</title>
		<link>http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20035</link>
		<dc:creator>Martín</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogdesign.com/blog-usability/will-feedburner-or-plain-xml-get-you-more-subscribers/#comment-20035</guid>
		<description>I guess the major issue I have is that the page is not intuitive enough for people who know what they’re doing. What surprises me is that most web development blogs choose to use Feedburner when the majority of their user base are likely to be versed in what RSS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the major issue I have is that the page is not intuitive enough for people who know what they’re doing. What surprises me is that most web development blogs choose to use Feedburner when the majority of their user base are likely to be versed in what RSS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

